August 2, 2016
Now Non Sequiturs
The lady doth protest too much, me thinks
Now the Lickspittle media are using non sequiturs to prove that we should vote for Hillary and not that Trump guy, come November 8, 2016.
Here’s the definition, from Merriam-Webster’s:
Full Definition of non sequitur
- 1 : an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically : a fallacy resulting from a simple conversion of a universal affirmative proposition or from the transposition of a condition and its consequent
- 2 : a statement (as a response) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said
So: Donald Trump does not want to allow unfettered entry into this country by just any people, whether they be Mexican criminals or Syrian Muslims who could cause more possibility of crime (as in the case of the Mexican criminals) or terrorism (as in the case of the Syrian Muslims). Therefore – Donald Trump hates this Muslim couple that was used by the Democrats at their convention last week.
If that makes no sense – welcome to non sequitur-ville.
In fact, it’s the Democrats who should be accused of using this Muslim couple for their political ends. First of all, they are not just a ‘Muslim couple”, they’re an AMERICAN couple. They are two unique Americans who lost their son, who volunteered to defend the freedom of this nation, wherever he was called. Their brave son gave the ultimate sacrifice: he died so that we may continue to live free lives in the United States of America. So – what does the death of this brave man have to do with the Democratic Convention, Hillary Clinton, or Donald Trump? The only connection I can see is the cynical use of a couple’s grief to score political points – and they did not speak at the Republican Convention, so…
The Lickspittle Media should be castigating the Democrats for their heartless abuse of parent’s grief. But instead, they become real reporters again and analyze Trump’s response to an unfair attack. Trump never said there weren’t MANY patriotic, brave Americans who happen to be Muslims who haven’t given their lives so that we can be free. This young man should get nothing but praise for giving the ultimate sacrifice for us. But… that has nothing to do with Mr. Trump seeing a problem and wanting to not only solve it, but prevent it from getting worse. That problem, of course, is terrorism – the very reason this brave young man went to Iraq: to make sure there are no more terrorist attacks on his own nation, the USA, like he saw on 9/11.
This is all about terrorism. So was Brexit. The British people saw the terrible things that were happening on the continent – acts of terrorism; undisciplined gangs of young Muslim men let loose in European cities – and wanted no part of it. Like Germany and Sweden – among others – they were being forced to allow the immigration of large numbers of refugees from Morocco and Syria, for example, who are primarily Muslims. And – these acts of terrorism and wanton sexual attacks on women, are all being caused by people acting in the name of Allah, not Elohim. And – it’s not just Paris, Brussels, Nice, and Munich; it’s Koln and Stockholm, places where these gangs have sexually assaulted many women.
Of course, these terrorist acts have occurred in our nation, on our soil, already. Need we mention the first World Trade Center Bombing in 1993… 9/11… the Fort Hood shooter… the Boston Bombers… San Bernardino… Orlando… and many other terrorist acts? All inspired by people who praised Allah, not Yahweh.
And second: there’s that other example of twisted logic – the fact that Trump is (or is not) a friend of Vladimir Putin. Wait a minute – I thought that was a GOOD thing? Don’t we want our national leaders to be friends? I thought we WERE friends with all the world’s national leaders – that’s a significant globalist goal, isn’t it? I thought the other countries were AFRAID of Donald Trump – didn’t the Democrats make a big deal about him not being trusted with “the nuclear button”? Well – here he is, ALREADY a good buddy with the leader of the Soviet – oops – Russia – and it’s supposed to be a BAD thing now? Liberal logic is SO CONFUSING!
Maybe they shouldn’t try to use so many non sequiturs, huh?